The district court of Mannheim with Judgement on 18/02/2011, reference number 3 found C 472/10,:
- parking and unloading in the vicinity of an industrial drive does not constitute a failure, nor is it at 30 - minutes duration lasting and tangible.
- prohibits the same reasons, the adoption of a single farm operation, because the only indirect effect is not goal-directed turned against the trading activities.
- An arranged stopping is not a protection act for the benefit of the immediate land dwellers, especially when the road permits because of their width, the moving in and out through normal driving maneuvers with no obvious danger to other vehicles.
parked on 11/02/2010 at 13.10 clock the driver of the vehicle, the defendant's truck in the turning area adjacent to the premises of the applicant. In the turning area, a holding prohibition sign is appropriate. It was about 30 minutes loading and unloading.
The applicant believes that an injunction was necessary because of concerns was that the defendant will continue to carry supply activities and will continue to block the turning area or the street outside the premises of the applicant's. The
is the district court - and rightly - rejected. It was quite simply no impairment of the plaintiff to prove: the property of the applicant was not injured. The right to an established and operative business was not hurt.
Sometimes I wonder why such a lawsuit is ever done.
